┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
  RECORD TYPE ......... ANNOTATION — SOURCED RECORD
  REGISTRY NO. ........ MARG-2508
  SLUG ................ /roxas-v-marcos-yamashitas-gold
  STATUS .............. CLOSED
  FILED ............... 2026-07-19 23:00 UTC
  LAST ANNOTATED ...... 2026-07-19 23:00 UTC
  CLAIMS ON FILE ...... 8
  MEAN TAG CONFIDENCE . 0.85
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
FILED

Roxas v. Marcos: Yamashita's Gold Claim and Court Findings (1998)

The *Roxas v. Marcos* case, culminating in a 1998 Hawaii Supreme Court ruling, centered on claims by Filipino treasure hunter Rogelio Roxas that he discovered a portion of 'Yamashita's Gold' in 1971, including a golden Buddha statue and gold bars. Roxas alleged that then-President Ferdinand Marcos and his agents subsequently seized this treasure, and he endured arrest and torture. The Hawaii Supreme Court affirmed that Roxas had found a golden Buddha and some gold, and that the Marcoses had converted these items. However, the court largely reversed the initial damages awarded for the vast quantity of gold Roxas claimed to have found, citing speculative evidence, and ultimately based its judgment on the value of the golden Buddha, 17 gold bars, and damages for human rights abuses.

The strongest case for Roxas's claims rests on the Hawaii Supreme Court's finding that he did discover a golden Buddha statue and some gold, and that Ferdinand Marcos's agents unlawfully seized these items. Testimony from an American mining expert who stated Marcos showed him a matching golden Buddha with a removable head further supports Roxas's account. The fact that Marcos was known for looting the Philippines lends credibility to the narrative that he would confiscate such a find, especially considering the human rights abuses Roxas endured.

The primary counter-argument against the broader claims of 'Yamashita's Gold' being a vast, real treasure, and Roxas having found a massive portion of it, comes directly from the Hawaii Supreme Court's final judgment. The court ultimately reversed the extensive damages initially awarded, finding insufficient evidence for the large quantity of gold Roxas claimed. The judgment was eventually based on a smaller, specific amount of gold and the golden Buddha, indicating that the court did not fully corroborate the grander 'Yamashita's Gold' narrative as Roxas presented it.

  1. VERIFIEDCONF 1.00

    Yamashita's Gold refers to alleged war loot stolen by Imperial Japanese forces during World War II and hidden in the Philippines.

    — attributed to: Wikipedia

    • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamashita%27s_gold
  2. CORROBORATEDCONF 0.90

    Rogelio Roxas was a treasure hunter who found a golden Buddha statue and boxes of gold bars in an underground tunnel in the Philippines in 1971, which he believed to be part of Yamashita's Gold.

    — attributed to: Rogelio Roxas via US lawsuit, Casebriefs, Lexplug

    • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogelio_Roxas
    • https://casebriefsco.com/casebrief/roxas-v-marcos
    • https://www.lexplug.com/casebrief/roxas_v_marcos_69e6a15540176cdf68e9a1f8
  3. CORROBORATEDCONF 0.90

    Ferdinand Marcos and his agents raided Roxas's home, seized the golden Buddha statue and gold bars, and arrested and tortured Roxas.

    — attributed to: Rogelio Roxas via US lawsuit, Casebriefs, Unsolved Mysteries coverage

    • https://casebriefsco.com/casebrief/roxas-v-marcos
    • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogelio_Roxas
    • https://www.reddit.com/r/Philippines/comments/12w60kh/in_1993_robert_stacks_unsolved_mysteries_covered/
  4. VERIFIEDCONF 1.00

    The Supreme Court of Hawaii, in *Roxas v. Marcos* (1998), ruled that Imelda Marcos was liable for damages for the conversion of the golden Buddha statue and gold bars discovered by Roxas.

    — attributed to: Supreme Court of Hawaii

    • https://www.scribd.com/document/862149762/Roxas-v-Marcos-1998-Supreme-Court-of-Hawaii-Decisions-Hawaii-Case-Law-Hawaii-Law-US-Law-Justia
    • https://law.justia.com/cases/hawaii/supreme-court/1998/20606-2.html
    • https://case-law.vlex.com/vid/89-hawai-i-91-891648611
  5. VERIFIEDCONF 1.00

    The Hawaii Supreme Court reversed a significant portion of the damages awarded for conversion of gold, stating that evidence for the vast quantity of gold Roxas claimed was speculative.

    — attributed to: Supreme Court of Hawaii

    • https://www.scribd.com/document/862149762/Roxas-v-Marcos-1998-Supreme-Court-of-Hawaii-Decisions-Hawaii-Case-Law-Hawaii-Law-US-Law-Justia
    • https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/63dri7/til_the_supreme_court_of_hawaii_ordered_ferdinand/
  6. SINGLE-SOURCECONF 0.80

    The final judgment in *Roxas v. Marcos* was based on the value of the golden Buddha, 17 gold bars, and damages for human rights abuses suffered by Roxas.

    — attributed to: Reddit user citing the Supreme Court reversal

    • https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/63dri7/til_the_supreme_court_of_hawaii_ordered_ferdinand/
  7. SINGLE-SOURCECONF 0.70

    An American mining expert testified in the trial that Ferdinand Marcos had shown him a solid gold Buddha statue with a removable head that matched Roxas's description.

    — attributed to: History.com

    • https://www.history.com/articles/wwii-yamashita-treasure-roxas-marcos-gold-buddha
  8. UNVERIFIABLECONF 0.50

    Ferdinand Marcos stole as much as $10 billion from the Philippines during his time in office.

    — attributed to: Reddit user

    • https://www.reddit.com/r/Military/comments/15fx0z2/yamashitas_gold_and_other_alleged_lost_war/
  • 1971Rogelio Roxas allegedly discovers a golden Buddha statue and gold bars in the Philippines. [src]
  • 1971Ferdinand Marcos's agents allegedly seize the treasure from Roxas, and Roxas is arrested and tortured. [src]
  • 1988-03Rogelio Roxas files a US lawsuit against Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos. [src]
  • 1993Rogelio Roxas dies of natural causes. [src]
  • 1998The Supreme Court of Hawaii rules on *Roxas v. Marcos*, affirming liability but reversing damages for speculative evidence. [src]
  • PERSON Rogelio RoxasTreasure hunter, plaintiff in Roxas v. Marcos
  • PERSON Ferdinand MarcosFormer President of the Philippines, defendant in Roxas v. Marcos
  • PERSON Imelda MarcosWife of Ferdinand Marcos, defendant in Roxas v. Marcos
  • ORG The Golden Budha CorporationCo-plaintiff in Roxas v. Marcos
  • ORG Supreme Court of HawaiiCourt that presided over Roxas v. Marcos
  • ORG United States District Court for the District of Hawai'iCourt referenced in initial proceedings
  • PLACE PhilippinesLocation of alleged treasure discovery and seizure
  • PLACE HawaiiLocation of court proceedings
  • EVENT Yamashita's GoldAlleged war loot from WWII
  • What were the exact monetary damages awarded to the Roxas Estate in the final judgment of *Roxas v. Marcos* for the golden Buddha, 17 gold bars, and human rights abuses?
  • Are there any declassified Philippine government records or contemporary news reports from 1971 that document Rogelio Roxas's discovery or the subsequent seizure by Marcos's agents?
  • Can the identity and testimony of the 'American mining expert' who allegedly saw the golden Buddha with Ferdinand Marcos be independently verified through court transcripts or other primary sources?
  • What specific evidence or legal reasoning did the Hawaii Supreme Court use to determine the 'speculative' nature of the larger gold quantities claimed by Roxas?
  • Were there any further legal proceedings or appeals related to the enforcement of the *Roxas v. Marcos* judgment against the Marcos Estate or Imelda Marcos?
  1. [WEB] https://www.scribd.com/document/862149762/Roxas-v-Marcos-1998-Supreme-Court-of-Hawaii-Decisions-Hawaii-Case-Law-Hawaii-Law-US-Law-Justia
    The Supreme Court of Hawaii ruled on the case Roxas v. Marcos, where Roger Roxas and The Golden Budha Corporation sued Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos over the alleged conversion of a golden buddha statue and gold bars discovered by Roxas. The court found that Imelda Marcos was liabl
  2. [WEB] https://casebriefsco.com/casebrief/roxas-v-marcos [archived]
    Roxas (P) was a treasure hunter who is alleged to have found the Yamashita Treasure, which consisted of a golden Buddha Statue, gold bars, and diamonds. D, then president of the Philippines raided P's home and took the treasure as well as what remained on site. P was arrested and
  3. [WEB] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogelio_Roxas [archived]
    In March 1988, a US lawsuit was filed by Rogelio Roxas against former Philippine president, Ferdinand Marcos and his wife Imelda Marcos. Roxas alleged that he was a treasure hunter who in 1971 was searching for Yamashita's gold. In determining whether there was sufficient evidenc
  4. [WEB] https://www.history.com/articles/wwii-yamashita-treasure-roxas-marcos-gold-buddha
    During the trial, an American mining expert testified that Ferdinand Marcos had shown him a solid gold Buddha statue with a removable head, which matched the statue photographed with Roxas in 1971.
  5. [WEB] https://case-law.vlex.com/vid/89-hawai-i-91-891648611
    Imelda argues that the circuit court erred in: (1) amending the judgment to substitute Imelda as the personal representative of the Marcos Estate and entering judgment against her in that capacity; (2) denying Imelda's motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the
  6. [WEB] https://www.lexplug.com/casebrief/roxas_v_marcos_69e6a15540176cdf68e9a1f8
    Rogelio Roxas discovered the "Yamashita Treasure," including a solid gold buddha statue and boxes of gold bars, in an underground tunnel in the Philippines. Roxas took the golden buddha and 24 gold bars to his home, where prospective buyers tested the statue and confirmed it was
  7. [REDDIT] https://www.reddit.com/r/Military/comments/15fx0z2/yamashitas_gold_and_other_alleged_lost_war/ [archived]
    Roxas claimed that the statue he found was replaced with a fake by Marcos and the gold was never seen again. Given that this is the same former President that stole as much as $10 billion from the Philippines during his time in office and subsequent trials found sufficient eviden
  8. [REDDIT] https://www.reddit.com/r/Philippines/comments/4l8lwd/marcos_and_the_yamashita_treasure/ [archived]
    Armed with Fuchugami's description of his father's maps and Ocubo's representations, Roxas organized a group of partners and laborers to search for the treasure and obtained a permit for the purpose from Judge Pio Marcos, a relative of Ferdinand.
  9. [REDDIT] https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/birqua/til_that_yamashita_gold_is_real_gold_and/ [archived]
    TIL that Yamashita Gold is real (gold and treasures looted by the Japanese throughout Asia during WII that were buried in the Philippines), and Hawaii supreme court ruling Roxas v. Marcos ruled in favor of Roxas, the treasure hunter who found one of the 175 tunnels where the trea
  10. [REDDIT] https://www.reddit.com/r/Philippines/comments/12w60kh/in_1993_robert_stacks_unsolved_mysteries_covered/ [archived]
    In 1993, Robert Stack's Unsolved Mysteries covered the Golden Buddha that treasure hunter Roger Roxas found in 1971 near an excavation in his home. Marcos' henchmen threatened, tortured and harassed Roxas and his family, demanding that he tell where the treasure was found and to
  11. [REDDIT] https://www.reddit.com/r/Philippines/comments/uqmohw/does_the_marcos_family_really_own_a_million_tons/ [archived]
    A common trend of the disinformation involving the Marcos family is that they owned a huge amount of gold even before they rose to power. Part of this wealth came from a Filipino "royal family" called the Tallanos, who ruled over the pre-colonial "Maharlika kingdom." The Tallano
  12. [REDDIT] https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/63dri7/til_the_supreme_court_of_hawaii_ordered_ferdinand/ [archived]
    The Supreme Court actually reversed that (this reversal is what is linked here), noting that there wasn't any evidence for the huge amount of gold Roxas had supposedly discovered, and the final judgement ended up being based on 17 bars of gold, the statue, and the fact that he su
  13. [REDDIT] https://www.reddit.com/r/UnresolvedMysteries/comments/9bs0y9/yamashitas_gold_fact_or_fiction/ [archived]
    Yamashita's Gold - Fact or Fiction? Someone successfully sued the Marcos family over it and their estate received a payment equal to what they found, Imelda has claimed the family fortune came from it - but the reality is the family fortune came from looting the Philippines, ther
  14. [WEB] https://law.justia.com/cases/hawaii/supreme-court/1998/20606-2.html [archived]
    The plaintiffs-appellees respond that the issue of personal jurisdiction is precluded by the doctrine of collateral estoppel, in light of a purported ruling of the United States District Court for the District of Hawai`i, which they cite as Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos,
  15. [WEB] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamashita%27s_gold [archived]
    Yamashita's gold, also referred to as the Yamashita treasure, is the name given to the alleged war loot stolen from across Southeast Asia by Imperial Japanese forces during World War II and supposedly hidden in caves, tunnels, or underground complexes in different cities in the P
  16. [REDDIT] https://www.reddit.com/r/Treasure/comments/nm54fi/thoughts_on_yamashitas_gold/ [archived]
    Thoughts on Yamashita's gold? Before we dive, portions of it has already been found by both Filipino and Japanese treasure hunters. The most famous one was the story of Rogelio Roxas who found a Golden Buddha in the 1970s but was seized under Ferdinand Marcos.